Residents of Mallangkona in Meghalaya's West Khasi Hills are vehemently opposing drilling activities for iron ore in their region.
A company, purportedly comprised of locals, began prospecting in Chual Napram (Werang Abri) under Nonglang Sordarship, sparking outrage among the villagers.
The controversy erupted when villagers discovered the company conducting drilling operations without their consent.
Senior citizens, youth organisations, and residents from 25 villages visited the site and witnessed large drilling machines extracting deep soil samples.
Their latest visit on May 23 confirmed extensive drilling activities.
The villagers demanded an immediate halt to the drilling, citing the absence of local permissions and the potential environmental impact.
They highlighted concerns about the area's water table and the proximity of drilling to a crucial water catchment area serving 24 villages.
"When we contacted the prospectors, they claimed to have permission from the state and mining department. However, aside from one village headman, Madan Jira, no other local leaders were consulted. This is a serious issue affecting the entire community," stated Enos G Momin, a local resident.
During their visit, villagers discovered drill holes reaching depths of 57 meters and numerous sample boxes stacked at the site.
When confronted, the prospectors initially failed to produce the necessary documents but promised to return with the required permissions.
On the morning of May 27, a large number of villagers gathered at the Mallangkona Outpost to meet the prospectors and discuss their objections.
The villagers argued that iron ore mining would irreparably damage the local environment and disrupt their lives.
The prospectors presented a prospecting license valid for 50 years and covering 496 hectares.
"If mining continues for 50 years, our community will be devastated. Future generations will inherit a barren landscape, and no compensation can replace what we've lost," asserted members of the Garo Students' Union (GSU) – Aradonga unit, who participated in the talks.
The prospectors assured the villagers that any future steps would involve consultations with the entire community.
They explained that the current phase was preliminary and that they would obtain all necessary clearances and hold public meetings if they found viable iron ore deposits.
Despite these assurances, the villagers remained resolute in their opposition. "They may secure all required permissions, but we will not allow iron ore mining in our area. We value our environment and the future of our children. The state government must intervene to protect our lives and lands," urged members of the Mallangkona Area Development Organization (MADO).
A representative from the Mallangkona Youth Multipurpose Society (MYMS) emphasised their determination to resist mining activities, regardless of official clearances. "We will stand firm against the desecration of our lands for the profit of a few," he said.
The villagers have decided to escalate their protests, starting with formal complaints to various state departments and the office of the Chief Minister. They plan to involve the mining and forest departments in their first phase of action.
If their grievances are not addressed, they are prepared to launch more intense agitation to safeguard their future.
The conflict underscores the broader tension between local communities and industrial interests in Meghalaya.
The residents of Mallangkona are fighting to preserve their environment and way of life against the encroachment of mining operations.
Their resistance is rooted in a deep-seated commitment to protecting their natural resources and ensuring a sustainable future for their children.
The prospecting company's assurances of future consultations and compliance with regulations have done little to assuage the villagers' fears.
The community's unified stance against the mining project reflects a broader resistance to industrial activities that threaten traditional livelihoods and environmental integrity.
As the situation unfolds, the state government faces the challenge of balancing economic development with the preservation of local communities' rights and environmental sustainability.
The outcome of this conflict will likely set a precedent for similar disputes in the region, highlighting the need for more inclusive and transparent decision-making processes in resource management.
Follow us
