Union Home Minister Amit Shah has directed sharp criticism towards the Congress party, citing remarks made by Sam Pitroda, Chairman of the Indian Overseas Congress, advocating for an inheritance tax-like law.
Shah's comments come in the wake of a growing controversy surrounding Pitroda's suggestion, which has sparked debate and raised questions about the Congress' policy stance.
In an interview with a media agency, Shah minced no words in asserting that Pitroda's remarks have left the Congress completely exposed. He pointed out a series of incidents, including references in the Congress manifesto to a "survey" and past statements by former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, which Shah characterised as part of the Congress' legacy.
However, it was Pitroda's recent comment on wealth distribution that Shah deemed particularly revealing of the party's true intentions.
Shah emphasised the gravity of Pitroda's suggestion, stating that it provided a glimpse into the Congress' agenda. He demanded that the Congress take a clear stance on the matter—either retract the suggestion from their manifesto or openly acknowledge their intention to redistribute wealth.
Shah urged the public to scrutinise Pitroda's statement seriously, asserting that it laid bare the Congress' underlying motives.
Pitroda's initial remarks centred on the concept of inheritance tax, drawing parallels with the United States' policy. He argued in favour of adopting a similar approach in India, suggesting that wealth redistribution could promote fairness.
However, Pitroda's comments ignited controversy, prompting him to clarify that he was merely using the US example as a reference during a television conversation.
Responding to the backlash, Pitroda reiterated that his comments were taken out of context and did not represent any specific policy proposal of the Congress.
He sought to downplay the issue, emphasising that his remarks were part of a broader discussion and should not be misconstrued as official party policy. The Congress officially distanced itself from Pitroda's remarks, affirming that they did not reflect the views of the party at all times.
Pitroda's proposal is controversial, and Shah's critique highlights this as well as the ramifications for the Congress. The story emphasises the difficulties the party faces in resolving internal conflict and attempting to make sense of its stances on policy in the face of public scrutiny.
Follow us
