India’s security establishment has sounded a quiet alarm following the arrest of 20 Bangladeshi nationals in Malaysia last month over alleged links to the Islamic State (ISIS). The development, according to intelligence officials, has triggered concern in New Delhi over possible spillovers into India’s eastern and northeastern states.
A classified dispatch from the Bangladesh High Commission in Kuala Lumpur, shared with Indian interlocutors, notes that five of the accused have been formally charged with terrorism-related offences. The remaining individuals, Malaysian authorities say, are still under investigation for suspected roles in extremist activities.
The suspects were apprehended in sweeping counter-terror operations conducted by Malaysia’s Defence Intelligence Organisation (MDIO) between late April and mid-June, targeting suspected ISIS recruitment and financing cells operating out of Selangor and Johor.
A senior Indian intelligence officer stationed in Dhaka said, “The network aimed to propagate extremist ideology, raise funds for militant operations and ultimately destabilise governments, in Malaysia and Bangladesh’s neighbouring countries, especially India.”
Three of the detainees, Nazrul Islam Sohag, Mohammad Redwanul Islam and Zahid Ahmed, have already been deported to Bangladesh. Sohag and Islam were flown back under tight escort on Air Asia flight AK-71, while Ahmed arrived separately aboard Batik Air flight OD-162. All were received at Hazrat Shahjalal International Airport on July 3 and taken into custody by Bangladesh’s Directorate General of Forces Intelligence (DGFI).
The individuals are currently being interrogated by the Counter-Terrorism Intelligence Bureau (CT-IB), after which formal charges, if any, are expected. Indian officials, meanwhile, are reportedly monitoring the process closely, in the hope of identifying any potential links to radicalised elements in Indian states bordering Bangladesh, namely West Bengal, Assam and Tripura.
Also read: Indian intel flags unusual Pak military activity in Bangladesh
However, official statements from Dhaka appear at odds with the scale of the crackdown. Bangladesh’s Home Ministry Adviser, Lt. General (Retd) Jahangir Alam Chowdhury, downplayed the incident, claiming there were “no Bangladeshi terrorists in Malaysia” and insisting that only three nationals were deported for visa violations. “There is no extremism in Bangladesh now,” he added, in remarks that Indian and Malaysian agencies have privately called premature and dismissive.
Such reassurances have failed to convince Indian counter-terror officials. A senior officer based in the East said, “We are not just concerned about Bangladesh’s internal security posture. If these elements can build networks in Malaysia, they can easily find support in bordering Indian states.”
The Malaysian government, for its part, remains unequivocal. In a statement released on 27 June, the Malaysian Home Ministry reiterated its “zero tolerance” approach to terror networks and vowed that “no foreign group will be allowed to operate on its soil”.
Analysts note that this episode is yet another reminder of the evolving nature of transnational jihadist networks in South and Southeast Asia. The IS, though territorially weakened in the Middle East, continues to exert influence through regional affiliates and ideological sympathisers.
For India, the episode also revives memories of previous infiltration attempts and homegrown radicalisation modules with links to global jihadist movements. Intelligence sharing with both Malaysia and Bangladesh is expected to deepen in the coming weeks.
Whether Dhaka chooses to confront the full implications of the arrests remains uncertain. But as one official in India’s eastern theatre observed, “Silence or denial will only embolden sleeper networks. This needs active dismantling, not public relations.”