palestinian-full-membership-blocked-by-us-at-the-un

The United States recently exercised its veto power in the UN Security Council to block a Palestinian bid for full membership in the United Nations. This development came during a vote on a draft resolution that proposed recommending the State of Palestine for full UN membership.

 

The resolution garnered 12 votes in favour, with Switzerland and the UK abstaining and the US casting the lone veto. As a result, the Palestinian quest for full state status at the United Nations was halted once again.

 

The 15-member Security Council requires at least nine votes in favour and no vetoes by any of its five permanent members—China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States—to adopt such a resolution.

 

The veto by the United States is a significant setback for the Palestinian Authority, which has sought to elevate its status from a "non-member observer state" to that of a full member state. Since 2012, when the UN General Assembly upgraded the Palestinian Authority's observer status, Palestine has been able to participate in General Assembly debates but without the ability to vote on resolutions.

 

US Ambassador Robert Wood, explaining the rationale behind the veto, emphasised America's commitment to a two-state solution through direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority.

 

He noted that while the US supports Palestinian statehood, it believes that only through direct negotiations can the complex issues surrounding statehood be effectively resolved.

 

Ambassador Wood also highlighted concerns regarding the governance and territory control within the Palestinian regions, pointing out the significant influence of Hamas in Gaza, which the US designates as a terrorist organisation.

 

The rejection of full membership for Palestine reflects ongoing complexities in Middle Eastern politics, where the US consistently supports Israel's security needs and sovereignty claims. This stance has frequently put it at odds with the aspirations of the Palestinian leadership and its supporters globally.

 

The Palestinian response to the veto was marked by disappointment and resolve. Riyad Mansour, Permanent Observer of the State of Palestine to the United Nations, expressed profound frustration over the decision, emphasising the inalienable nature of the Palestinian people's right to self-determination and statehood.

 

Despite the setback, Mansour reaffirmed the Palestinian commitment to continue pursuing full membership and statehood, underscoring that the quest for recognition and rights would persist unabated.

 

The impact of this decision extends beyond the diplomatic realm. It comes at a time when tensions in the region are exceptionally high, with ongoing conflicts and violence affecting countless lives.

 

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, speaking on the broader Middle East situation, warned of the escalating dangers and the pressing need for a sustainable peace solution that ensures security and dignity for both Israelis and Palestinians.

 

As the international community continues to grapple with these issues, the path forward remains fraught with challenges.

 

The US veto on Palestine’s full UN membership underscores the intricate and often conflicting international dynamics that continue to dominate the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, highlighting the difficulty in reaching a consensus on even the fundamental question of Palestinian statehood within the framework of the United Nations.