In a critical move to avoid being banned in the United States, TikTok, alongside its parent company ByteDance, has filed an emergency request with the US Supreme Court.
This is part of their last-ditch effort to prevent a law that mandates TikTok’s parent company to sell the short-video app by January 19. Failure to comply would lead to the app's removal from the US market.
The companies filed this request after the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the law earlier in December, rejecting TikTok's argument that it violated the First Amendment rights to free speech.
The emergency request seeks an injunction to delay the law's enforcement while TikTok continues to appeal the decision.
The law, passed by Congress in April, asserts that TikTok, being a Chinese-owned company, poses a severe national security threat. The US government claims that TikTok has access to vast amounts of data about American users, from their locations to private communications.
The concern is that this data could be used to manipulate the content seen by users, raising fears about the influence of foreign powers on American citizens' digital experiences.
In their filing to the Supreme Court, TikTok and ByteDance argue that the government cannot censor American speech simply by identifying potential risks of foreign influence.
They state that if Americans are aware of these risks and still choose to use TikTok, the First Amendment protects their right to do so without government interference.
According to the companies, even a brief shutdown would have a significant impact on TikTok's user base in the United States, potentially causing a loss of a third of its users. This would also hurt the app's ability to attract advertisers and create content, ultimately damaging its financial stability.
TikTok argues that it is one of the most important platforms for free speech in the country, offering a space for millions of Americans to express themselves.
The request for an injunction comes just days before the deadline set under the law. If the Supreme Court does not act swiftly, TikTok would be forced to comply with the divestment order or face the app's removal from US app stores.
This could lead to a significant disruption for the 170 million Americans who use TikTok.
Notably, the dispute between TikTok and the US government occurs against the backdrop of heightened tensions between the United States and China, with both countries engaged in a complex trade and geopolitical struggle.
The legal battle could set a precedent for future efforts to regulate foreign-owned tech companies operating in the US.
TikTok has vehemently denied any allegations of sharing American user data with the Chinese government. The company claims that the concerns raised by US lawmakers are speculative and not based on concrete evidence.
TikTok's spokesperson, Michael Hughes, stated that the company is asking the Supreme Court to apply the most rigorous scrutiny to speech bans, as it has done in previous free speech cases.
On the other hand, the D.C. Circuit court, which upheld the law, noted that the First Amendment was designed to protect free speech in the US.
However, it allowed for the restriction of speech that could potentially undermine national security, especially when the foreign government involved is deemed an adversary, such as China.
The court also argued that the government's actions were solely aimed at protecting the American public from foreign surveillance and data collection.
If the law stands, TikTok could be prohibited from offering its services in the US, effectively forcing ByteDance to divest from the company.
This law would apply not only to TikTok but also to other foreign apps controlled by adversary nations, such as WeChat, which was the subject of a failed ban attempt by former President Donald Trump in 2020.
Follow us
