The Supreme Court has recently taken a strong stance regarding the plea of a woman Coast Guard officer seeking Permanent Commission, emphasizing the fundamental principle that women cannot be marginalized within the defense services.
Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, presiding over the matter, firmly stated that gender equality must prevail, warning that judicial intervention may be necessary if the government fails to proactively adhere to existing norms and address the issue.
During the hearing, the Attorney General representing the Centre argued that the Coast Guard operates differently from the Army and Navy, suggesting that this difference might justify differential treatment.
However, the Chief Justice rebuffed this argument, asserting that functional differences cannot serve as valid excuses for excluding women from Permanent Commission opportunities. He stressed that such discriminatory practices are untenable in the current era, highlighting the imperative of inclusivity in 2024.
The Court's directive to the Centre to provide a response underscores its commitment to addressing gender disparities within the defense services. By scheduling the next hearing for March 1, the Court has signaled its readiness to take decisive action if necessary.
Prior to this development, a three-judge bench, led by CJI Chandrachud, had sharply criticized the Centre and the Coast Guard for their refusal to grant Permanent Commission to women officers.
The bench emphasized the importance of fair treatment and underscored that the Coast Guard cannot deviate from granting Permanent Commissions, especially when the Navy and Army have already done so.
The Court's reference to the Babita Punia judgment, which affirmed women Short Service Commission officers' entitlement to Permanent Commission on par with their male counterparts, underscores the legal precedent supporting gender equality in the defense forces.
The petition filed by Priyanka Tyagi, a Coast Guard officer, serves as a poignant reminder of the persistent challenge of gender discrimination within the defense services. Her plea signals a broader effort to address systemic inequalities and promote inclusivity within the armed forces.
Overall, the Supreme Court's scrutiny of this matter reflects its commitment to upholding the rights of women officers and ensuring equitable treatment within the defense establishment. Through its proactive intervention, the Court seeks to foster a culture of inclusivity and gender equality in line with constitutional principles.
Follow us
