delhi-court-rejects-kejriwal-s-plea-for-personal-doctor-orders-aiims-panel

The Rouse Avenue Court's decision to reject Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's plea for special medical provisions, including daily video consultations and insulin administration, regarding his acute diabetes marks a crucial juncture in the ongoing legal proceedings.

 

Despite Kejriwal's plea citing the necessity of immediate medical attention, the court opted for a different approach, directing AIIMS to form a specialised medical panel to oversee his health needs.

 

This development underscores the court's acknowledgment of Tihar Jail's responsibility to provide essential medical care to Kejriwal. However, it also recognizes the need for expert consultations and tailored treatment plans for individuals with complex medical conditions.

 

By entrusting AIIMS with the task of forming a medical board comprising senior endocrinologists and diabetologists, the court aims to ensure comprehensive and specialised care for Kejriwal's diabetes management.

 

The directive to the AIIMS Medical Board to devise a treatment plan, including dietary and exercise guidelines specific to Kejriwal's condition, reflects the court's commitment to addressing his health needs effectively.

 

Until a formal plan is established, Kejriwal is permitted to continue with his home-cooked meals, provided they adhere strictly to the prescribed diet. Any deviations from the recommended diet must be promptly reported to the AIIMS Medical Board for review and action.

 

Moreover, the court's instruction for AIIMS to assess the necessity of insulin administration and provide a timely report underscores its commitment to ensuring appropriate medical interventions.

 

Additionally, the decision to authorise jail authorities, in consultation with the AIIMS Medical Board, to make future medical decisions emphasises the importance of collaborative decision-making in matters concerning Kejriwal's health.

 

Kejriwal's plea highlighted his previous success in managing his diabetes through the "Insulin Reversal Programme" before his arrest disrupted his treatment regimen.

 

The plea also raised concerns about the adequacy of medical care during his judicial custody, alleging lapses in diabetes management. Conversely, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) accused Kejriwal of deliberately consuming foods detrimental to his health to create a medical emergency for sympathetic treatment from the court.

 

The complex intersection of health, legal, and administrative considerations highlighted in this case underscores the need for a balanced approach to managing the medical needs of individuals in custody.

 

By addressing these concerns through a collaborative effort involving judicial oversight, expert medical opinion, and institutional accountability, the court aims to ensure the effective delivery of medical care to Kejriwal while upholding the principles of justice and fairness.