The Supreme Court of India has temporarily halted a contentious dress code imposed by Chembur College in Mumbai, which had prohibited students from wearing hijabs, stoles, or caps on campus. This decision came after a petition challenged the college’s circular, which had earlier been upheld by the Bombay High Court.
On Friday, a bench led by Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Sanjay Kumar issued a notice on the petition and decided to stay the ban specifically on hijabs and caps.
This interim order represents a partial victory for students who argued that the college's dress code infringed upon their religious and personal freedoms. The court's decision to stay the ban is not a final judgement but rather a temporary measure while the case is further reviewed.
During the hearing, the Justices expressed their surprise at the college’s stringent dress code and questioned its rationale. Justice Khanna was particularly critical, pointing out that the ban seemed to be an unjustifiable restriction on students' freedom to express their religious identity.
He remarked that if the intent was to prevent religious identification, it was an ineffective approach since religion can often be inferred from names. He also raised concerns about whether the college would impose similar restrictions on other religious symbols, such as bindis or tilaks, suggesting that the dress code unfairly targeted visible expressions of religious identity.
The college’s legal counsel defended the dress code by arguing that face-covering veils, such as naqab or burqas, could impede student interaction and participation. The Supreme Court agreed that face-covering garments could not be worn in classrooms but chose not to interfere with this aspect of the college’s dress code.
The court’s decision to stay the ban on hijabs and caps indicates a recognition of the importance of allowing students to maintain their personal and religious expression while navigating educational environments.
The challenge to the college’s dress code followed a ruling by the Bombay High Court in June, which had upheld the ban. The High Court dismissed a plea from students who contended that the ban violated their fundamental rights to privacy, dignity, and religious freedom.
The college had defended the ban as a measure to ensure that students' attire did not reveal their religion, thus fostering a focus on education rather than personal beliefs.
The Supreme Court's temporary stay on the ban is a significant development in the ongoing legal struggle over religious dress codes in educational institutions. The court’s decision highlights the delicate balance between maintaining institutional policies and respecting individual rights.
The case will be further examined in November, and the Supreme Court has expressed hope that this interim order will not be misused by any party involved. The ruling represents a crucial moment in the broader debate over religious expression and institutional regulations within educational settings.
Follow us
