The Delhi High Court is set to hear a crucial petition on Monday filed by renowned wrestlers Bajrang Punia, Vinesh Phogat, Sakshi Malik, and her husband Satyawart Kadian.
The petition aims to challenge and declare as illegal the recent elections conducted by the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI). These wrestlers, who played pivotal roles in last year's protests demanding justice for alleged sexual harassment within the federation, seek to rectify what they perceive as blatant violations of the Sports Code.
Scheduled before Justice Sachin Datta, the plea argues that the elections held on December 21 were conducted in defiance of established regulations and standards outlined in the Sports Code.
The wrestlers are urging the court to intervene and direct the WFI to cease all activities related to wrestling until the matter is resolved. The petition highlights a pattern of harassment and intimidation faced by athletes who have dared to challenge the status quo within the WFI.
Allegations of misconduct and irregularities have marred the federation's reputation, prompting calls for reform and accountability. Furthermore, the petitioners advocate for the continuation of an ad-hoc committee to oversee the WFI's operations or, alternatively, the appointment of a retired Supreme Court judge to ensure transparency and fairness in its management.
It is asserted that the WFI's persistent disregard for directives issued by the Sports Ministry and the ad-hoc committee has had detrimental effects on the careers of Indian wrestlers.
Despite clear instructions to refrain from administrative activities, the WFI has persistently organized unauthorized trials and events, undermining the integrity of the sport and the aspirations of its athletes.
Ultimately, the petition seeks the annulment of the disputed elections and a reaffirmation of the rule of law within the WFI. As the legal battle unfolds, the outcome of Monday's hearing holds significant implications for the future of wrestling in India and the broader fight against corruption and injustice in sports governance.
Follow us
