The political landscape in Punjab’s panthic sphere is facing a situation akin to the 'Church-State Conflict'. Tensions have arisen between the religious and political leadership, with the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) representing the 'panthic' interests on one side and former acting Akal Takht Jathedar, Giani Harpreet Singh, on the other.
This confrontation marks a critical juncture in Punjab’s panthic politics, where both sides will need to define the boundaries of their respective domains.
This is essential for the well-being of both the religious and political institutions and for the state as a whole.
Under the current system, the SAD, as the representative party of the panth, is at a distinct disadvantage compared to other political parties.
While the leaders of the SAD are held accountable to the Akal Takht for any acts of religious misconduct, other political leaders are rarely subject to such scrutiny.
The conflict has been exacerbated by the Akal Takht's December 2 ruling, which imposed religious punishments (tankhah) on several Akali leaders.
This decision has continued to ripple through panthic politics.
The immediate aftermath was a murderous attack on SAD president Sukhbir Singh Badal by an extremist Khalistani supporter, who justified the attack by accusing Badal of "admitting" to religious "guilt."
The Akal Takht’s pronouncement not only imposed penalties on Akali leaders but also demanded that Sukhbir Badal resign as party president.
However, such a resignation could disqualify the SAD as a political entity, as the Election Commission of India has questioned its registration as a political party rather than a religious one. This legal challenge adds another layer of complexity to the issue.
With the Akal Takht holding considerable power over religious affairs, it is vital that the appointed Jathedar remains impartial and above political interests.
Any decisions made by the Jathedar can have far-reaching implications, not just for individuals but for the panth as a whole.
The current crisis stems from a growing rift between Giani Harpreet Singh and the SAD leadership. Though he was appointed by the SAD-controlled SGPC, Harpreet Singh took an independent approach, which alienated the Akali leadership.
The SAD’s split from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) further intensified the friction, as Harpreet Singh was accused of cultivating ties with the BJP.
His private meeting with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and his ‘Z’ category security cover were points of contention for the SAD leadership.
Despite the majority of Akali leaders maintaining silence, one senior Akali leader, Virsa Singh Valtoha, publicly confronted Harpreet Singh.
As a result, Valtoha was banned from politics for ten years, a decision believed to have been influenced by Harpreet Singh.
The SAD-controlled SGPC has initiated an inquiry against Harpreet Singh over a complaint filed by the ex-husband of one of his sisters-in-law. The timing of the inquiry, which comes after the issue was allegedly resolved earlier, has raised suspicions.
Harpreet Singh has denied any wrongdoing and maintains that the complaint is baseless.
The leadership of the SAD has long suspected Harpreet Singh’s ambition to take control of the party, potentially with the BJP’s backing.
Though Harpreet Singh has repeatedly denied these charges, the situation has become increasingly tense, with the religious leader gaining considerable support among the panthic masses.
However, he also faces strong criticism from a section of the community. With the SAD in control of the SGPC, the inquiry against Harpreet Singh places him at a disadvantage.
Despite this, Harpreet Singh continues to appeal to the panthic public and garner significant support.
The current standoff is shaping up to be a long and drawn-out battle, much like the Church-State conflict in Europe.
The eventual outcome could lead to a separation of powers between the religious and political spheres of panthic leadership.
Follow us
