News Arena

Home

Nation

States

International

Politics

Defence & Security

Opinion

Economy

Sports

Entertainment

Trending:

Home
/

antitrust-battle-with-eu-google-loses-usd-4-7-billion

Economy

Antitrust battle with EU: Google loses USD 4.7 billion

The ECJ dismissed the appeal filed by Google and its parent company Alphabet, effectively confirming the penalty originally imposed by the European Commission in 2018 over the company's anticompetitive business practices related to Android.

News Arena Network - Luxembourg City - UPDATED: July 2, 2026, 03:08 PM - 2 min read

thumbnail image

Representational image.


A major legal setback for Alphabet and its subsidiary Google came on Wednesday after the European Court of Justice (ECJ) upheld a multibillion-dollar antitrust penalty against the US technology giant for abusing the dominant position of its Android mobile operating system.


The ECJ dismissed the appeal filed by Google and its parent company Alphabet, effectively confirming the penalty originally imposed by the European Commission in 2018 over the company's anticompetitive business practices related to Android. Although the fine was reduced by the General Court in 2022, the ruling ensures that Google remains liable for a penalty of approximately USD 4.67 billion.


In its judgment, the ECJ said, "The Court of Justice dismisses the appeal brought by Google and Alphabet against that judgment of the General Court, thereby confirming the penalty imposed on them, as revised by the General Court, for their anticompetitive practices relating to the Android operating system."


The case stems from a landmark investigation launched by the European Commission in 2015 after it received multiple complaints concerning Google's conduct in the mobile internet market. Following a three-year probe, the Commission concluded in 2018 that Google had illegally used the popularity of the Android operating system to strengthen the market position of its search engine and other services, thereby restricting competition and limiting consumer choice.


According to the Commission's findings, Google required smartphone manufacturers to pre-install its Search app and the Google Chrome browser on Android devices if they wanted to obtain a licence for the Google Play Store, an essential platform for distributing Android applications. Regulators argued that this practice unfairly favoured Google's own products while making it significantly harder for competing search engines and browser developers to reach users.


The Commission also found that Google entered into so-called anti-fragmentation agreements with smartphone manufacturers. Under these agreements, companies seeking licences to pre-install Google's Search and Play Store applications were required to refrain from selling devices running alternative or modified versions of Android that had not been approved by Google. European regulators concluded that these restrictions curtailed innovation by preventing the development and adoption of rival Android-based operating systems.


A third area of concern involved Google's revenue-sharing agreements with smartphone makers and mobile network operators. The Commission determined that Google offered financial incentives in the form of advertising revenue-sharing arrangements on the condition that manufacturers and operators did not pre-install competing search services on specified portfolios of Android devices. According to regulators, these arrangements further cemented Google's dominance by discouraging competition from rival search providers.


In 2022, the General Court largely upheld the Commission's conclusions, agreeing that Google had imposed unlawful restrictions on smartphone manufacturers in a bid to reinforce its already dominant position in the online search market. While the court slightly reduced the financial penalty after reassessing certain aspects of the Commission's reasoning, it maintained that the company's conduct violated European Union competition rules.

 

Also read: NITI Aayog devising policies to push critical mineral extraction


The origins of the case date back nearly a decade. The European Commission formally opened proceedings against Google on April 15, 2015, following complaints from several companies and industry stakeholders regarding the tech giant's practices in the rapidly growing mobile ecosystem. Its investigation found that some of the restrictive contractual provisions imposed by Google had been in place since January 1, 2011.


The ruling marks another significant victory for European regulators in their long-running efforts to rein in the market power of major technology companies. In recent years, the European Union has adopted stricter competition and digital market regulations aimed at ensuring fair competition and preventing dominant platforms from abusing their market position.


The introduction of the Digital Markets Act has further strengthened the European Commission's enforcement powers against large digital platforms designated as "gatekeepers." Under the new regulatory framework, companies face stricter obligations designed to promote competition and provide consumers with greater choice across digital services.


The latest judgment against Google comes amid broader regulatory scrutiny of the world's largest technology firms. Last year, the European Commission imposed substantial financial penalties on Apple and Meta for alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act, underscoring the European Union's increasingly aggressive approach toward enforcing competition rules in the digital economy.

 

TOP CATEGORIES

  • Nation

QUICK LINKS

About us Rss FeedSitemapPrivacy PolicyTerms & Condition
logo

2026 News Arena India Pvt Ltd | All rights reserved | The Ideaz Factory