baghel-claims-evms-changed-ec-fact-checks

On Monday, senior Congress leader and former Chief Minister of Chhattisgarh, Bhupesh Baghel, alleged that several Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and VVPAT units were replaced after the polling in the Rajnandgaon Lok Sabha seat, where he contested the elections.

 

Baghel claimed that the numbers of several EVMs used in the April 26 voting in Rajnandgaon, provided by the Election Commission of India (ECI), do not match the details of the machines used in the respective booths as mentioned in Form 17C.

 

However, Rajnandgaon's returning officer denied any irregularities or mismatches in numbers.

 

The alleged mismatch in EVMs number shared with the INC candidate of Rajnandgaon PC, is not based on facts.

The EVMs used during polls are exactly according to the list of machines shared by Returning Officer after randomization with contesting candidates. @ECISVEEP
1/4 https://t.co/4DWpHRcUOE pic.twitter.com/vE5HJkPAaj

— Chief Electoral Officer, Chhattisgarh (@CEOChhattisgarh) June 3, 2024

 

 In a post on his X handle on the Lok Sabha poll counting eve, the former CM said, "The Election Commission had given the numbers of the machines used in the voting. This includes (numbers of) ballot unit, control unit and VVPAT.

 

"According to the information mentioned in Form 17 C after the voting in my constituency Rajnandgaon, the numbers of several machines have changed. The booths where the numbers of machines have been changed affect thousands of votes." Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) is an independent system attached with the EVMs that allows electors to verify that their votes are cast as intended. When a vote is cast, a slip is printed containing the serial number, name and symbol of the candidate and remains exposed through a transparent window for 7 seconds. Thereafter, this printed slip automatically gets cut and falls in the sealed drop box of the VVPAT.

 

Baghel, the Congress candidate from Rajnandgaon, said he has approached Chhattisgarh's chief electoral officer with his grievances.

 

"Similar complaints have been received from many other Lok Sabha constituencies. We are complaining to the State Election Officer. @ECISVEEP should answer under what circumstance the machines were changed and who will be responsible for any impact on the election result. The list of changed numbers of machines is very long but a small list is enclosed for your perusal," he added.

 

The returning officer (RO) of the Rajnandgaon Lok Sabha seat rejected his allegations, saying the complaint was baseless and beyond facts.

“The alleged mismatch in EVMs number shared with the INC candidate of Rajnandgaon PC, is not based on facts,” the RO said on X.

 

"After the announcement of the Lok Sabha elections 2024, the first randomisation of EVMs was done using the software provided by the ECI, and the machines were allotted assembly seat-wise and a list in this regard was provided to the recognised political parties," the returning officer said in a statement.

 

"The second randomisation was done in front of the candidates contesting the elections, and a signed list was provided to them. During the commissioning of EVMs, the machines that developed snag were replaced with those kept in reserve, and a list of both faulty machines and machines installed in place of them was provided, and an acknowledgement was received," said the statement.

 

The EVMs that malfunctioned during mock poll and actual voting were replaced with machines kept in reserve and its list was also given to all candidates, it said.

 

The statement said that at polling stations, in the presence of candidates' polling agents, the machine's number address tag, 'matpatra lekha' 17C part 1, presiding officer's diary, mock poll certificate, etc. are recorded in many documents, which can be matched during the vote counting.

 

"The presiding officer may have committed clerical errors. During the voting, only those machines were used whose list was provided to candidates from time to time. The entire process is completely transparent and agents and representatives of candidates were present at every level and observed it. Polling agents present at polling stations themselves sign various documents after seeing the EVM number," it said.

 

The returning officer said clerical errors can be corrected during the vote count by comparing the EVMs and documents.