News Arena

Join us

Home
/

controversial-amendment-bill-delayed-again-in-pakistan

International

Controversial amendment bill delayed again in Pakistan

Reports so far indicate that the government plans to increase the retirement age of judges and fix the tenure of the chief justice of the Supreme Court.

News Arena Network - Islamabad - UPDATED: September 16, 2024, 09:52 PM - 2 min read

Reports so far indicate that the government plans to increase the retirement age of judges and fix the tenure of the chief justice of the Supreme Court.

Controversial amendment bill delayed again in Pakistan

To pass the amendment, reportedly to increase the retirement age of judges and fix the tenure of the chief justice of the Supreme Court,.the government needs 224 votes in the National Assembly and 64 in the Senate. The coalition strength in the NA is 213 and 52 in the Senate. Photo - for representation.


Tabling of a controversial constitutional amendment bill was pushed back in Parliament again by Pakistan's coalition government on Monday as the required numbers couldn’t be mustered up to pass it.


There is no clarity so far on the amendments as the government has not officially shared it with the media or discussed it publicly. 

 

Reports so far indicate that the government plans to increase the retirement age of judges and fix the tenure of the chief justice of the Supreme Court.


Senator Irfan Siddiqui of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) told the media that the amendment bill would not be tabled in the parliament on Monday.

 

Speaking to Geo News, Siddiqui said sessions of both houses on Monday were to be "prorogued” and “would next be called when we would be prepared from all angles to introduce a constitutional amendment.”

 

Asked if the matter would be delayed further, he added that the legislation is likely to be tabled within a week or two.

 

"It was our wish that this [legislation is passed] within two days […],” the senator said.

 

The government failed to get the bill tabled as it couldn’t get the support of Maulana Fazlur Rehman, the chief of Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam (JUI-F).

 

To pass the amendment, the government needs 224 votes in the National Assembly and 64 in the Senate. The coalition strength in the NA is 213 and 52 in the Senate. The JUI-F, with eight NA members and five senators, is in a position to play a major role.

 

The government claims that if Rehman supported the amendment, it would be passed in both houses as the government had already won the support of other smaller parties.

 

Siddiqui described Rehman as “very flexible” during meetings and quoted him as saying that he “did not have a principle difference” on some of the proposed legislation but stressed the need for time to review the package.

 

Sources said that the JUI-F chief supports the amendments but not the entire package. He also wants that the PTI should also be taken on board to create consensus on the constitutional package of changes.

 

Meanwhile, the National Assembly met at aroud midday where opposition Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party (PTI) criticised the government for trying to weaken the judiciary.

 

Former speaker and PTI leader Asad Qaiser strongly condemned the “use of Parliament as a rubber stamp,” saying it has been turned into a joke.

 

He claimed that even the law minister did not know about the proposed draft. "So if a government representative does not know, then where has this document come from?”

 

He said that the PTI was in favour of judicial reforms, but such reform should be introduced after debate and discussions. "Is this how you wanted to pass the bill, in the dark of the night like thieves, on Saturday and Sunday night?”

 

In response, Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar said that the bill had “not yet been presented before the federal cabinet as a draft nor in CCLC (Cabinet Committee for Disposal of Legislative Cases)”, adding that once it is presented before the parliament, its details would be known.

 

Defence Minister Khawaja Asif said the legislation was an attempt to correct constitutional imbalances, especially regarding the parliament.

 

“It is an attempt to undo the 19th Amendment,” Asif added, referring to legislation that envisaged a new system for appointments in the superior courts. 

TOP CATEGORIES

  • Paris Olympics

QUICK LINKS

About us Rss FeedSitemapPrivacy PolicyTerms & Condition
logo

2024 News Arena India Pvt Ltd | All rights reserved | The Ideaz Factory