Iran's Defense Minister, Aziz Nasirzadeh, has responded to the recent delivery of the U.S. Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) missile defence system to Israel, labelling it as a part of the "enemy's psychological warfare." This comment came during a press briefing on the sidelines of a weekly cabinet meeting in Tehran.
Nasirzadeh downplayed the significance of the THAAD system, emphasising that it is not a new technology and has been around for some time.
He stated, “The THAAD is an anti-ballistic missile system. It is not a new thing and has existed before. We assess such actions as being in line with the enemy’s psychological warfare. There is no particular problem in that regard.” His remarks reflect Iran's view that the U.S. actions are intended to create fear and tension rather than address any genuine security concerns.
The United States confirmed the shipment of the THAAD system to Israel, including military personnel to operate the system. This development follows escalating tensions in the region, particularly after Iran conducted missile strikes on Israeli targets earlier this month. The U.S. decision to bolster Israel's defence appears to be a direct response to these growing hostilities.
On October 1, Iran launched approximately 180 missiles aimed at various targets in Israel. The Iranian government described these attacks as retaliation for the recent killings of key leaders associated with regional resistance groups and for Israel’s military actions against armed groups in Lebanon and Palestine. These missile strikes have intensified the already fraught relations between the two nations.
In the wake of these developments, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has reacted strongly, declaring that Iran has made a “grave mistake.” He warned of consequences for Iran's actions and vowed to take necessary steps to safeguard Israel's security. Netanyahu’s comments highlight the high stakes involved in this ongoing conflict, as both countries remain on alert for any potential escalations.
The exchange of threats and military preparations between Iran and Israel underscores the volatility of the region. The deployment of the THAAD system represents not just a defensive manoeuvre but also a strategic signal to Iran regarding the U.S. commitment to Israel’s security. As both nations prepare for possible further confrontations, the situation remains tense.
Critics of the U.S. involvement argue that sending advanced military systems to Israel could provoke further instability in the region. They fear that it may lead to an arms race, prompting neighbouring countries to enhance their military capabilities in response. Such developments could increase the likelihood of miscalculations and unintended confrontations in an already delicate situation.
Follow us
