apex-court-cancels-madras-hc-s-bail-to-pfi-men

The Supreme Court took a significant step on Wednesday by cancelling the bail granted by the Madras High Court to eight individuals who were booked under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA).

 

These men were associated with the banned organisation Popular Front of India (PFI) and were accused of conspiring to commit terrorist acts across the nation.

 

A bench comprising Justices Bela M Trivedi and Pankaj Mithal revoked their bail, emphasising that the allegations against them, particularly regarding the collection of funds for terrorist activities, appeared to be prima facie true.

 

The court expressed concern over the gravity of the offence and the relatively short period of incarceration, which led to the decision to cancel their bail.

 

The apex court set aside the Madras High Court's order granting bail to the eight men. It stressed the importance of maintaining judicial scrutiny, especially in cases involving serious offences that threaten national security. Additionally, the court directed the trial to be expedited and ordered the accused to surrender.

 

This decision by the Supreme Court came in response to an appeal filed by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), challenging the Madras High Court's decision from October 19, 2023. The High Court had previously declined to link the accused with terrorist activities, particularly the offence of collecting funds for such acts.

 

The case against the accused involved the discovery of various documents, including images with markings of RSS leaders and other Hindu organisations, in their possession. These findings suggested that certain leaders were targeted, raising concerns about potential threats to their safety.

 

By cancelling the bail and expediting the trial, the Supreme Court has underscored the importance of upholding national security and ensuring that individuals involved in activities that pose a threat to public safety are brought to justice swiftly.

 

This decision reflects the judiciary's commitment to safeguarding the interests of the nation and its citizens against terrorist threats.