A Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) meeting on the Waqf bill took a chaotic turn when Trinamool Congress MP Kalyan Banerjee injured his hand during a heated argument. The incident reportedly occurred after tensions escalated between Banerjee and BJP MP Abhijit Gangopadhyay.
During the argument, Banerjee, in a moment of frustration, picked up a glass water bottle and struck it on the table, inadvertently injuring himself. According to sources, Banerjee sustained cuts to his hand and required four stitches. Following the incident, he was escorted back to the meeting room by AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi and AAP leader Sanjay Singh.
The meeting, held at the Parliament Annexe, had to be temporarily paused due to the commotion. Despite the disruption, the meeting resumed shortly after, though the incident highlighted the rising tensions among political parties during discussions on the sensitive Waqf bill.
The argument erupted during the debate on provisions of the Waqf bill, a topic that has already seen heated exchanges among MPs from different political backgrounds. The disagreement that led to the incident is seen as a reflection of the growing political friction on matters relating to minority community affairs.
The JPC meeting, tasked with examining the Waqf bill, involves members from different political parties, including the Trinamool Congress, BJP, AIMIM, and AAP.
The bill itself addresses the administration and regulation of Waqf properties, which are meant for religious and charitable purposes in the Muslim community.
Despite the disruption, the meeting continued after Banerjee was treated for his injuries. His return to the session underscored his commitment to the discussions, though the atmosphere remained tense. The incident has drawn attention to the emotional and political weight the Waqf bill holds, with leaders clashing over its implications.
The Waqf bill has been a matter of contention, with various political parties expressing strong opinions on how Waqf properties should be governed. The scuffle between Banerjee and Gangopadhyay highlights the deep-seated differences among members of the committee, raising concerns over how future discussions on the bill will proceed.
While no further alterations were reported after the incident, it serves as a reminder of the challenges the committee faces in achieving consensus on the sensitive issues involved in the Waqf bill. Political differences continue to shape the discourse, and incidents like this only deepen the divide.
The JPC, composed of members from multiple political factions, is responsible for reviewing the provisions of the Waqf bill and making recommendations for amendments or improvements. The incident involving Kalyan Banerjee is likely to remain a talking point as the committee moves forward with its deliberations.
Observers and political analysts have pointed to the growing polarisation within parliamentary debates, with personal disagreements spilling over into confrontations. The tension surrounding the Waqf bill reflects broader political dynamics, as parties position themselves on sensitive issues affecting minority communities.
As the JPC continues its work, incidents like this highlight the intensity of the political process and the challenges lawmakers face in navigating contentious debates.
Whether the committee can overcome these hurdles and produce a bill that satisfies all stakeholders remains to be seen, but the recent scuffle has certainly added to the drama surrounding the discussions.
Follow us
