News Arena

Home

Bihar Assembly

Nation

States

International

Politics

Opinion

Economy

Sports

Entertainment

Trending:

Home
/

sc-flags-concern-over-up-s-anti-conversion-law-cites-secularism

Nation

SC flags concern over UP's Anti conversion Law, cites secularism

The Supreme Court recently raised serious questions over the provisions of Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, observing that the law seems to introduce an "onerous procedure" for a person wanting to change his religion.

News Arena Network - New Delhi - UPDATED: October 24, 2025, 05:30 PM - 2 min read

thumbnail image

Representational image


The Supreme Court recently raised serious questions over the provisions of Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, observing that the law seems to introduce an "onerous procedure" for a person wanting to change his religion.

 

The Bench of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra also flagged the "conspicuous" nature of the involvement and interference of government authorities in the process of religious conversion."The constitutional validity of the provisions of the U.P. Conversion Act does not fall for our consideration in the instant case.

 

Nonetheless, we can’t help but observe that the provisions of the said Act pertaining to the pre and post-conversion declaration seem to introduce a very onerous procedure to be followed by an individual seeking to adopt a faith other than the one he professes. The involvement and interference of the State authorities in the conversion procedure is also conspicuous, with the District Magistrate having been legally obliged to direct a police enquiry in each case of intended religious conversion," it also noted.

 

The Court further observed that the requirement of making public the details of converts may require a deeper examination in context of the right to privacy."Further, the statutory requirement of making public the personal details of each person who has converted to a different religion may require a deeper examination to ascertain if such a requirement fits well with the privacy regime pervading the constitution," it said.While highlighting the stringent procedure for religious conversion in the State, the Court considered it fit to point to the preamble and the secular nature of Indian Constitution.The Court stressed that the Preamble is of extreme importance and the Constitution should be read and interpreted in the light of its "noble and grand" vision.

 

It also underscored that though the word 'secular' was inserted into the Constitution through an amendment in 1976, secularism is an intrinsic part of the basic structure of the Constitution as was held in the 1973 decision in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala.

"In the preamble to the Constitution of India the words ‘SOCIALIST SECULAR’ were inserted by the Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976.

 

The secular nature of India is an intrinsic part of the ‘basic structure’ of the Constitution, as held in Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala reported in AIR 1973 SC 1461. As laid down in the Preamble, the People of India, have resolved to secure to all its citizens, liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship, apart from Justice, social, economic and political; Equality of status and of opportunity and to promote among them all fraternity, assuring the dignity of the individual, and the unity and integrity of the Nation," the bench said.

 

The Court added that people of India are given the liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship and that the liberty is an embodiment and expression of the secular nature of the country.The Court also said that the people in India have a right to propagate their religious views.The provisions of Uttarakhand Pradesh's conversion law were not under challenge before it, the Court limited its observation on the subject.

 

The law is under challenge before the top court in a different case.In the present matter, the Court was dealing with a batch of petitions concerning six criminal cases registered by Uttar Pradesh Police under various provisions of Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the anti-conversion law.One of the cases filed by a member of Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) was registered against 35 names and 20 unknown accused.

 

It also questioned how the statements of certain witnesses, who had neither undergone conversion nor been at the place of alleged mass conversion, could help the prosecution case."The criminal law cannot be allowed to be made a tool of harassment of innocent persons, allowing prosecuting agencies to initiate prosecution at their whims and fancy, on the basis of completely incredulous material," the Court said.

TOP CATEGORIES

  • Nation

QUICK LINKS

About us Rss FeedSitemapPrivacy PolicyTerms & Condition
logo

2025 News Arena India Pvt Ltd | All rights reserved | The Ideaz Factory