The Supreme Court of India has raised concerns regarding the increasing misuse of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
This law, originally introduced to protect married women from cruelty by their husbands and in-laws, has been criticised for becoming a tool for personal vendettas in matrimonial disputes. The Court expressed its disapproval while quashing a case filed under Section 498A against a husband and his parents.
The bench, comprising Justices BV Nagarathna and N Kotiswar Singh, pointed out that the law was intended to address real cases of cruelty and ensure quick intervention by the State.
However, in recent times, as matrimonial disputes have risen sharply across the country, there has been a worrying trend of using Section 498A as a weapon in personal conflicts.
The judges observed that, instead of addressing genuine cases of abuse, the law was sometimes invoked to settle scores and pressure the husband and his family, often with unreasonable demands.
The Supreme Court’s ruling was delivered after hearing an appeal from a husband and his family who challenged the Telangana High Court's decision. The High Court had earlier refused to quash a domestic cruelty case filed by the wife.
The case had been lodged after the husband sought a divorce. The apex court found that the wife's actions were more about settling personal grievances than seeking justice for genuine cruelty. The court stressed that the provision should not be used to further personal agendas.
In the judgment, the Court emphasised that allegations made during matrimonial disputes need to be carefully scrutinised. Vague and generalised accusations can easily lead to misuse of the legal process, encouraging unfair tactics that are not in line with the law’s original purpose.
Section 498A, while designed to protect women from cruelty, should not be manipulated to force compliance with unreasonable demands. The judges highlighted that similar cases have previously come before the Court, and in these instances, the misuse of the law was evident.
However, the Court also clarified that it did not intend to suggest that women who genuinely suffer cruelty should remain silent.
The intention behind their remarks was not to undermine the importance of Section 498A in protecting women from abuse but to prevent its misuse in cases where it serves as a countermeasure in personal disputes.
They made it clear that the provision was meant to protect women subjected to cruelty, particularly due to dowry demands, and not to be used as leverage in non-cruelty situations.
The verdict came after the wife filed a complaint under Section 498A following her husband's petition for the dissolution of their marriage. The Supreme Court made it clear that while it supported the protection of women from domestic abuse, it would not tolerate the misuse of the legal system to settle personal scores.
This case serves as an important reminder to both legal professionals and citizens about the need to ensure that laws like Section 498A are used appropriately and only in cases where there is genuine evidence of cruelty.
Follow us
