The Supreme Court of India has intervened in the ongoing protests at the Shambhu border between Punjab and Haryana, calling on both states to work together to resolve the situation. This decision comes after the Haryana government challenged a previous order by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had instructed the removal of barricades that have been in place since February.
The Supreme Court’s recent directive is aimed at de-escalating tensions and facilitating dialogue between the farmers and the authorities. The court emphasised the need for a smooth and peaceful negotiation process and urged the states to avoid actions that could inflame the situation further.
The Justices, Surya Kant and R Mahadevan, stressed the importance of not hurting the sentiments of the protesters and suggested that agricultural machinery and equipment should be allowed to reach their intended destinations.
The court's focus was on the need for a neutral and independent committee to address the farmers' grievances effectively. The panel would ideally include well-regarded individuals with expertise in agriculture and related fields. The idea is to establish a credible and impartial body to facilitate discussions and find solutions to the demands of the protesting farmers.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Haryana government, informed the court that efforts were underway to form such a committee, as previously directed. Both states were asked to propose names for the committee, which would ideally include former judges with experience in agriculture, agricultural scientists, economists, and professors from agricultural universities.
The ongoing protest, which began on February 13, has seen extensive barricading on the Ambala-New Delhi national highway. The protests erupted after the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (Non-Political) and the Kisan Mazdoor Morcha announced plans to march to Delhi in support of their demands for a legal guarantee of minimum support prices (MSP) for their produce. The protests have caused significant disruptions, with locals in the area struggling to access essential services due to the roadblocks.
During the court proceedings, concerns were raised about the impact of the blockade on local residents, particularly regarding access to medical facilities. The court suggested that there should be provisions for emergency and essential vehicle access while efforts are made to resolve the broader issues.
The court also highlighted the need for both states to coordinate with the police to ensure that emergency vehicles and senior citizens have unobstructed access to the highway. This measure aims to balance the need for maintaining public order with the practical needs of those affected by the blockade.
As of now, the interim arrangements put in place by the court will continue until further orders. The Supreme Court has requested both states to suggest neutral and experienced individuals for the committee and to submit a proposal for the phased removal of the barricades. The next hearing is scheduled for August 12, when the court will review the progress made and determine the next steps.
The Supreme Court’s involvement underscores the gravity of the situation and the need for a well-considered approach to resolving the standoff. By encouraging dialogue and seeking the involvement of impartial experts, the court aims to address the underlying issues and bring about a resolution that respects the rights and concerns of all parties involved.
Follow us
