In a recent verdict, the Supreme Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the enactment of new criminal laws by the Parliament, including the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam.
These laws were slated to replace the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Evidence Act, and the Code of Criminal Procedure, respectively. The bench, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, emphasized that the laws were not yet in force, questioning the petitioner's standing in the case.
The petitioner, T Sivagnanasambandan, filed the PIL on January 6, 2024, well before the laws were formally notified. However, the Union Government announced on February 24 that the new laws would come into effect on July 1, 2024. Despite this announcement, the specific date for the enforcement of these provisions is yet to be officially declared.
These legislative changes, passed by Parliament on December 21, 2023, and receiving Presidential assent on December 25, 2023, are contingent upon notification by the Union Government for their implementation. The Supreme Court noted this procedural requirement, underscoring that the laws were not currently operational.
Chief Justice Chandrachud highlighted the absence of legal grounds for challenging laws that were not yet in force, leading to the dismissal of the PIL. The court's decision reflects the principle of legal standing, requiring petitioners to demonstrate a direct and tangible interest in the matter at hand.
T Sivagnanasambandan v. Ministry of Law & Justice W.P.(C) No. 53/2024 serves as the legal nomenclature for the case, indicating the petitioner's attempt to challenge the new criminal laws preemptively. The court's ruling underscores the importance of procedural compliance and the need for petitioners to have a valid legal basis for challenging legislative measures.
As the effective date of the new laws approaches, stakeholders and legal experts will closely monitor developments to assess their impact on the country's criminal justice system. In the meantime, the Supreme Court's dismissal of the PIL reaffirms the legal framework governing challenges to legislative actions, emphasizing the importance of adherence to established procedures and principles of law.
Follow us
