In a far-reaching ruling, which seeks to eradicate bias in the armed forces, the Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that women Short Service Commission officers are eligible for Permanent Commissions. Using its extraordinary powers to deliver justice, the Supreme Court found a "flawed and discriminatory" evaluation system, which has marginalised women through arbitrary caps and assessments, to be unacceptable.
The bench, headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant, was of the opinion that this figure of 250 women officers per year was arbitrary and could not be considered sacrosanct in any manner. As per existing SSC regulations, officers are recruited for a period of 10 to 14 years, after which they are compelled to leave service, often without full pension benefits or a possibility of rising to command positions. A Permanent Commission, on the other hand, offers a career stretch of 20 years or more, with a definite prospect of achieving command positions and full retiral benefits.
The court was particularly scathing regarding the "casual" manner in which Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) for women were handled. It noted that these assessments were often processed under the preconceived — and mainland —assumption that these women would never be eligible for career progression. Male officers cannot expect that the Permanent Commission would remain exclusively male," the bench observed, pointing out that women were often denied the criteria appointments and courses to compete on par with their male colleagues.
In order to rectify such past injustice, the court directed that all eligible women officers be deemed to have completed 20 years of qualifying service, making them eligible for pensions along with all consequential benefits. This benefit will apply to women officers who were declared ineligible by past Selection Boards. While the court maintained that Permanent Commissions granted between 2019 and 2021 would remain undisturbed, it clarified that these specific orders do not apply to the Judge Advocate General (JAG) or Army Education Corps (AEC) cadres.
Regarding the Navy, the court ruled that women inducted after 2009 are entitled to Permanent Commissions, subject to medical fitness. While it upheld the Navy’s "dynamic vacancy model" as rational, it criticised the Ministry of Defence for a lack of transparency regarding selection marks. In the Air Force, the bench acknowledged that while operational effectiveness must be protected, length of service cannot be used as a shield to deny benefits to those who were never given a fair crack at progression. The ruling, further, concludes with a mandate for a comprehensive review of all military evaluation processes to ensure that structural biases are permanently erased from the ranks.
Also read: SC disposes Wangchuk's detention challenging plea
Follow us
