A legal question has been raised over the use of the designation "Councillor" by elected representatives of Municipal Councils and Nagar Panchayats in Punjab. The issue has come to the fore after a representation submitted to the Governor, Chief Minister, State Election Commission and other senior authorities by Punjab and Haryana High Court advocate Hemant Kumar.
In his representation, Kumar claims that the title "Councillor" is legally recognised only under the Punjab Municipal Corporation Act, 1976, and not under the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911, which applies to Municipal Councils and Nagar Panchayats.
The matter has gained attention following the recent Urban Local Body elections in Punjab, in which hundreds of representatives were elected to Municipal Corporations, Municipal Councils and Nagar Panchayats across the state.
According to the representation, Section 2(25) of the Punjab Municipal Corporation Act particularly defines a member of a Municipal Corporation as a "Councillor". However, no similar provision exists in the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911.
The advocate has argued that the absence of the term in the 1911 Act appears to be deliberate. He has cited principles of statutory interpretation, stating that when a legislature uses a term in one law but omits it from another dealing with a similar subject, the omission is generally considered intentional.
Based on this interpretation, the representation claims that elected ward representatives of Municipal Councils and Nagar Panchayats cannot legally use a designation that is not recognised under the law governing their institutions.
The representation also points out that many such representatives currently use the title "Councillor" on letterheads, signboards, social media profiles, official seals, public notices and various certificates. It argues that this may create confusion regarding the legal status of their office.
Seeking intervention, the advocate has requested the Punjab Government and the State Election Commission to issue an official clarification on the legally correct designation for elected ward representatives under the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911.
He has also sought directions to ensure that only legally recognised designations are used in official communications, records, certificates and public documents.
Legal observers say that if the issue is taken up by the government or the State Election Commission, it could lead to a review of official records, signboards, seals and communications used by Municipal Councils and Nagar Panchayats across Punjab.
The representation has been submitted to the offices of the Governor, Chief Minister, Local Government Minister, Chief Secretary, Administrative Secretary of Local Government and the State Election Commission for consideration.
Any official clarification on the issue could affect the designation used by thousands of elected representatives in Punjab's urban local bodies.
Also read: Badal accepted responsibility before Akal Takht, claims AAP
Follow us
