The Supreme Court has clearly clarified an important constitutional point of law this Tuesday by ruling that those who adopt a religion other than Hinduism, Sikhism, and Buddhism do not qualify for the Scheduled Caste (SC) category. Thus, the Supreme Court ruled that such persons do not qualify for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, as the same is dependent upon the religion of the claimant.
The decision came from a bench consisting of Justices PK Mishra and NV Anjaria, who upheld a previous judgment by the Andhra Pradesh High Court. The case centred on an appeal by Chinthada Anand, a village pastor who had alleged that he and his family were subjected to caste-based abuse and death threats by local individuals. While Anand had attempted to file charges under the SC/ST Act, the accused successfully argued that his long-term role as a Christian pastor meant he was no longer entitled to the specific legal protections reserved for the SC community.
In delivering the judgment, the bench was unequivocal: "No person who professes a religion other than Hindu, Sikh or Buddhist shall be a member of the Scheduled Caste." The court noted that because Christianity does not formally recognise the caste system, conversion into the faith results in the immediate loss of SC status. The justices pointed out that Anand had been functioning as a pastor for over a decade and was actually conducting Sunday prayers at the time of the alleged incident, leaving no doubt as to his religious standing on the day in question.
The ruling further reiterates the fact that SC certificate, in and of itself, is not enough to support the claim when the individual has openly accepted and converted to another faith not falling under the three specified categories. Unless the individual is able to prove their re-conversion and acceptance to their original fold, like the Madika community in this particular case, they are not able to avail the constitutional protection given to individuals belonging to the Hindu, Sikh, and Buddhist categories. This ruling has clearly demarcated the line when it comes to religious identification and judicial recourse based on caste.
Also read: Systemic bias led to denial of women’s permanent commission: SC